Newport City
2006
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
MEMBERS PRESENT: Charlie Elliott, Clark Curtis, Joan Poutre, Gerry Coulombe.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Paul Chandler.
OTHERS PRESENT: Greg Hamblett, Douglas Spates, Alan Aiken, Paul Monette, Charles Cook, Nancy Cook, Bob Kelley.
7:35 p.m.: Chairman Charlie Elliott called the meeting to order. Joan Poutre made a motion to approve the minutes to the last meeting (Dec 5) as written. Seconded by Gerry Coulombe. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Chairman Charlie Elliott read application 06-107 by R. F. Hamblett, Inc for a 16 ft by 32 ft storage addition. This property is located at 54 Coventry Street and is in Commercial Zone A zoning district. Mr. Hamblett was present to explain the request. The proposed addition was discussed. The applicant inquired about amending the application to include widening a portion of their second floor deck on their storage building. It is currently 5 ft wide and because of safety concerns they would like to make a portion of it 8 ft wide. The commission felt this would be a minor change and had no problem with amending the application. Mr. Hamblett did not have the exact dimensions of the deck expansion with him. Joan Poutre made a motion to table application 06-107 by R. F. Hamblett, Inc until their next meeting at 7:30 p.m. January 2, 2007 here in the council room. This will give the applicant time to amend the site plan with the exact dimensions of the deck expansion. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Chairman Charlie Elliott read application 06-106 by Douglas Spates to change the use of a portion of the building to a clinic. The dispensing of methadone will continue at the Coventry Street site. This property is located at 475 Union Street and is in an industrial zoning district. Mr. Spates and Mr. Aiken were present to explain the request. The types of services provided at the clinic were discussed. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
There is no change proposed to the existing parking, traffic access, or circulation for pedestrians and vehicles.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
There is no change to the existing landscaping, screening, or setbacks.
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project does not affect the utilization of renewable energy resources.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
Exterior lighting is minimal.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
The proposed use is similar to other uses in the area.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
There is no change proposed to the existing drainage control.
Drainage control is approved as submitted.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Clark Curtis made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-106 by Douglas Spates as submitted with the condition that no methadone be dispensed at the Union Street clinic. Seconded by Joan Poutre. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Discussion began on bylaw amendments. Mr. and Mrs. Cook were present to request that the setback from the lake be decreased in the Urban Recreation zoning district. They are going to be running a tour boat on the lake and would like to pull it onto their FARRANTS Point land into a boathouse for winter storage. Because of the size of the boat it is not feasible to use a crane to get it in and out of the water. They would like to see the setback from the water be change from 30 ft to 10 ft. The commission felt their request appeared reasonable. The commission will review the bylaw to determine if there is a feasible way to accomplish this that will not be detrimental to the Urban Residential district or the lake.
A proposal to change the
landscape requirement in a residential district was agreed to. The change is as
follows: §330.02 Where a non‑residential land use in a residential district
abuts any residential use in a residential district, a strip of land at least
fifteen feet in width shall be maintained as a landscaped area in the front
yard, side yards and rear yard which adjoin these uses. No landscape area is
required where the non-residential use abuts property used for a railroad.
If a non‑residential land use in a residential district abuts another
non-residential use, under site plan review a strip of land may be required as a
landscaped area between the properties.
Cell tower regulations were reviewed. Clark Curtis stated that his appeal of the Verizon permit is done and he feels he now does not have a conflict of interest, the commission agreed. Bob Kelley reviewed a list of changes he would like to see made to the revised cell tower regulations proposed by Charlie Elliott. The commission agreed with some of the changes. A new draft with the approved changes will be distributed. It is hoped that at their next meeting they will finalize revisions to the cell tower regulations and begin the process to amend the bylaw.
Other Business: SCI would like to present the commission with a proposal to extract gravel from the Kingdomgo property for the commission to review and comment on prior to submitting a formal application. They are hoping to be at the commission’s next meeting on Jan 2nd. Jim Mulkin would like to discuss the bylaw and City plan in regards to how it affects his property on the corner of the I-191 Access Road and Crawford Farm Road. He is also hoping to be at the Commission’s meeting on Jan 2nd.
10:00 p.m.: Upon a motion by Joan Poutre, seconded by Clark Curtis, the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley and filed for the record on 12/21/06.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Charlie Elliott, Gerald Coulombe, Clark Curtis, Joan Poutre.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Paul Chandler.
OTHERS PRESENT: Paul Monette, Steve Blake, John Stevens, David Humphrey, Jacques Roberge, Mike Isabelle, Charles Barker, Alain Delabruere, Mike Richard, Paul Julien, Bernie Chenette, John Perras, Jim Campbell, David Converse, Fran Risinger, Andy Larocque, Judy Ferrari, Bob Kelley.
7:30 p.m.: Chairman Charles Elliott called the meeting to order. Joan Poutre made a motion to approve the minutes to the last meeting (Nov 21) as written. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Mr. Larocque didn’t like the fact that there was no mention in the minutes about the discussion at the last meeting concerning whether the retaining walls were engineered or not.
Chairman Charles Elliott opened the meeting for discussion about application 06-097 by David Converse/David Humphrey for erosion control and concrete work with a 6 ft by 44 ft concrete land. This property is located north of the railroad track off of Farrant Street and is in an urban recreational zoning district. This was tabled from the November 21, 2006 meeting. Zoning Administrator Bob Kelley passed out to the commission material submitted earlier today by Mr. Stevens, on Mr. Humphrey’s behalf. The first letter requests that Mr. Kelley reconsider whether the work needs a permit, siting the bulkheads are exempt for needing a permit. Mr. Kelley stated that after consulting with the City’s attorney, he has not changed his mind. The work that has been done needs a permit and does not qualify for the exemption as a bulkhead. It also states that the landing near the water is the same size as the one that it replaced. This is in conflict with other testimony given by Mr. Converse. Mr. Kelley asked the Commission for their opinion of whether the landing changed in size. After weighing the evidence given the Commission felt that the size of the landing has increased. Mr. Kelley then stated that his original decision that the application requires conditional use approval from the Zoning Board stands. General discussion began regarding the application. The second packet submitted by Mr. Stevens included letters from Mr. Stevens (general project and neighborhood issues), Tom Bernier Director of Public Works (approval of final grades and drainage), Randy White Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railroad (railroads concerns with erosion), Danny Thomas contractor for the project (explaining work completed), and State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (complaints to the state and their conclusion that it does not need a state permit). Mr. Stevens made a point of reading the letters from Bernier, White, Thomas, and ANR. Also included was a new site plan drawn to scale which the commission accepted as adequate, numerous photos, receipts, and specs for the Redi-Rock Wall System. For the size of block used, the Redi-Rock Wall System is engineered for wall up to 12 ft high. This wall is 7 ft high and was built to the manufacture’s specs. Many of the same concerns that were discussed at the last meeting were repeated, along with new concerns regarding the new submittals. Charlie Elliott explained that the commission’s job is to review the application and testimony to see if it complies with the bylaw. Much of the discussion concerning who did what and when it was done is irrelevant. It was determined that the construction is 36 ft from the Barker property and the height of the wall was determined by the railroad’s required slope. The project is not quite complete. A few blocks still need to be place on the lower wall.
Clark Curtis made a motion to table application 06-097 by David Converse/David Humphrey until after it has gone thru Conditional Use Approval with the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the expansion of a nonconforming structure. Seconded by Joan Poutre. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Joan Poutre made a motion to table application 06-107 by R. F. Hamblett, Inc until 7:30 p.m. December 19, 2006 here in the council room of the municipal building because the applicant could not be present at tonight’s meeting. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The commission began review a sketch plan for a proposed 29-lot subdivision to informally discuss questions, concerns and the City permitting process. This property is owned by John Perras (formerly Bogner) and is located off the Lake Road. John Perras, owner, and Bernie Chenette, engineer for the project, explained the proposed subdivision. They would like the development to be a retirement community where the owner must be 55 or older. Homes are expected to be moderately sized at less than 2,000 sq ft. The Commission felt there were no major concerns with the sketch plan. The applicant should work with the Public Works Director and get him to sign off on the design prior to submittal of a formal application. The Commission felt there was a need for his type of development within the City. It is expected that a formal application will be submitted in January.
Clark Curtis made a motion to table discussion on bylaw amendment until their December 19th meeting. Seconded by Joan Poutre. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
9:45 p.m.: Upon a motion by Clark Curtis, seconded by Gerry Coulombe, the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley and filed for the record on 12/8/06.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Clark Curtis, Joan Poutre, Gerald Coulombe.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Charlie Elliott, Paul Chandler.
OTHERS PRESENT: John Stevens, Paul Monette, Steve Blake, David Converse, Charles Barker, Andy Larocque, Judy Ferrari, Fran Risinger, Francoise Julien, Bob Kelley.
7:30 p.m.: Vice Chair Joan Poutre called the meeting to order. Clark Curtis made a motion to approve the minutes to the last meeting (Nov 7) as written. Seconded by Gerald Coulombe. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Vice Chair Joan Poutre read application 06-097 by David Converse/David Humphrey for erosion control and concrete work with a 6 ft by 44 ft concrete land. This property is located north of the railroad track off of Farrant Street and is in an urban recreational zoning district. This was tabled from the October 17, 2006 meeting. It was noted that this project was complete prior to applying for a permit. Mr. Stevens and Mr. Humphrey were present to explain the request. Judy Ferrari, Andy Larocque, Fran Risinger, David Converse and Paul Monette participated in discussion of this project. Some of the concerns and opinions expressed were: Mr. Humphrey clear cut and removed vegetation causing the erosion of silt, dirt, and debris into the lake which jeopardized the stability of the bank; concerns for water quality; concerns for the stability of the bank and railroad bed; concerns that bank on Barker property is eroding; questioned why a permit was not obtained prior to work being done; concerned whether it complies with State regulations; concerns that Mr. Humphrey would do the work without even owning the land; concerns that silt barriers were not utilize to prevent dirt and silt from going into the lake. John Stevens and David Humphrey rebutted these concerns stating: wind and wave action along this shore is very strong and caused the erosion; the State was notified and it was not in their jurisdiction; Mr. Humphrey has an equity interest in the property with a purchase agreement; silt fences were used; project was engineered; no debris went into the lake; railroad came to Mr. Humphrey and told him he had to stabilize the bank. There was much disagreement concerning what was done and when it was done. The Commission had questions some of which were: Will the property be sold to Mr. Humphrey? Answer- Probably; Was there an agreement between Mr. Converse and Mr. Humphrey to do this work? Answer – No; What is the lot size? Answer – Approx 1800 sq ft; Does Mr. Humphrey have a letter from the concerning no jurisdiction from the State? Answer – No; Does Mr. Humphrey have a letter from the Railroad concerning this project? Answer – No; When was the project started? Answer – Approx 4 years ago.
Clark Curtis made a motion to stop discussion on application 06-097 by David Converse/David Humphrey and go into deliberative session. Seconded by Gerald Coulombe. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Upon returning from deliberative session the Commission requested that Zoning Administrator Bob Kelley notify the applicant that the site plan is not adequate. They need a drawing to scale showing the property lines, concrete landing, retaining walls and setbacks for each. Also in accordance with §336 and §337 the Director of Public Works must approve the finish grade and all provisions for controlling natural drainage water before the Commission is able to take action. It was determined that by the bylaw, the lake is considered a public R.O.W. The required setback from the lake is 30 ft and therefore the application also needs review from the Zoning Board of Adjustment for either a variance or conditional use approval. Zoning Administrator Bob Kelley is to research this and determine the appropriate review needed.
Clark Curtis made a motion to table application 06-097 by David Converse/David Humphrey until their next meeting at 7:30 p.m. December 5, 2006 here in the council room of the municipal building. Seconded by Gerald Coulombe. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Clark Curtis made a motion to table review of bylaw amendment until December 5th. Seconded by Gerald Coulombe. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
10:20 p.m.: Upon a motion by Clark Curtis, seconded by Gerald Coulombe, the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley and filed for the record on 11/27/06.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Charlie Elliott, Clark Curtis, Joan Poutre.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Paul Chandler.
OTHERS PRESENT: Rosemary Rowe, Gerry Coulombe, Ervin Goodwin, Terry Robbins, Bob Kelley.
7:35 p.m.: Chairman Charles Elliott called the meeting to order. Clark Curtis made a motion to approve the minutes to the last meeting (Oct 17) as written. Seconded by Joan Poutre. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Chairman Charles Elliott read application 06-102 by James Mulkin & Fred Oeschger for a 40 ft high communications tower to interface with the North Country Hospital main building on Prouty Drive. This property is located at 1734 Crawford Farm Road and is in an industrial zoning district. Mr. Robbins & Mr. Goodwin were present to explain the request. The height of the antenna was discussed and Mr. Robbins amended the application to indicate an antenna height of 48 ft and initialed the change. There was discussion if the antenna meets the maximum height limit. It was determined that it does. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
There is no change proposed to the existing parking, traffic access, or circulation for pedestrians and vehicles.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
There is no change to the existing landscaping, screening, or setbacks.
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project does not affect the utilization of renewable energy resources.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
There is no change to the exterior lighting.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
This will not change the relationship with existing adjacent uses.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
There is not changed proposed to the existing drainage control.
Drainage control is approved as submitted.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Joan Poutre made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-102 by James Mulkin & Fred Oeschger as amended. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The Commission began interviewing candidates to fill a vacancy from the resignation of Alan Franklin. Rosemary Rowe and Gerry Coulombe have applied. The Commission explained the role of the Planning Commission and what is expected of its members. They interviewed each candidate separately. After discussing the qualities of both candidates Clark Curtis made a motion to recommend to the City Council that Gerry Coulombe be appointed to fill the remainder of Alan Franklin’s term. Seconded by Joan Poutre. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Discussion began on bylaw amendments. An amendment to decrease the landscape requirement between nonresidential uses in a residential district was discussed and modifications were made. Bob Kelley will make a draft of the changes for the commission to review at their next meeting. Jim Mulkin submitted a proposal to change 812 East Main St from General Residential to Commercial this property is depicted on tax map #117 as lot #23. The commission agreed with the change and will add it to their list of amendments awaiting a pubic hearing. Joan Poutre made a motion to table discussion on changes to regulations dealing with Personal Wireless Telecommunication Facilities because at least one council member would like to be present for the discussion and was not able to attend the meeting tonight. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
9:30 p.m.: Upon a motion by Clark Curtis, seconded by Joan Poutre, the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley and filed for the record on 11/9/06.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Charlie Elliott, Clark Curtis, Joan Poutre.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Alan Franklin, Paul Chandler.
OTHERS PRESENT: Rick Burroughs, Bob Fitts, Joe Aja, John Benson, Steve Blake, Fran Risinger, Andy Larocque, Tim Clark, Mark Guyette, Jo Ann Guyette, Doug Spates, Charles Barker, James Bartley, Winston Bartley Jr., David Humphrey, Terry Robbins, Bob Kelley.
7:45 p.m.: Chairman Charles Elliott called the meeting to order. Clark Curtis made a motion to approve the minutes to the last meeting (Oct 3) as written. Seconded by Joan Poutre. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Review of the preliminary site plan for the North Country Career Center expansion project began. Rick Burroughs of Black River Design gave an overview of the proposed NCCC project and fielded questions. It is proposed to increase the current available 337 parking spaces to 353 parking spaces. Circulation has be changed to have a loop for buses only and access off of Duchess Ave will be for service vehicles and faculty only. A few of the parking spaces abutting the American Legion encroach on the required landscaping area. The commission felt that an amendment to the bylaw reducing or eliminating the landscape requirement between 2 nonresidential use in a residential zoning district. Ambulance access to the ball fields was discussed and it was felt that simply blocking off a couple of parking spaces during events would be adequate. The storm water treatment areas along Veterans Ave are partially within the City’s road ROW, they have talked with Public Works Director Tom Bernier about this and realize they will need some type of easement from the City. The project will increase the size of the school by approx 30,000 sq ft. They hope to begin construction in April 2007 and complete the project by August 2008. Construction on the Land Lab portion in Derby has begun. The commission had no major concerns with the preliminary plan. An application with the final site plan is expected to be submitted in about a month.
Chairman Charles Elliott read application 06-095 by Pine Bluff Estates Partnership for a lot line adjustment to add a 32 ft wide .9-acre strip of land to an existing 4.9-acre lot. Final lot sizes will be 11.5 ac and 5.8 ac. This property is located off Lakemont Road and is in a public health/office zoning district. Mr. Spates was present to explain the request. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
There is no change proposed to the existing parking, traffic access, or circulation for pedestrians and vehicles.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
There is no change to the existing landscaping, screening, or setbacks.
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project does not affect the utilization of renewable energy resources.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
There is no change to the existing lighting.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
There is no change to the existing use.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
There is not changed proposed to the existing drainage control.
Drainage control is approved as submitted.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Joan Poutre made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-095 by Pine Bluff Estates Partnership as submitted. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Chairman Charles Elliott read application 06-097 by David Converse/David Humphrey for erosion control and concrete work with a 6 ft by 44 ft concrete land. This property is located north of the railroad track off of Farrant Street and is in an urban recreational zoning district. Mr. Humphrey was present and asked the commission to table the application until after November 10th. John Stevens has been working with Mr. Humphrey on the application and is out of town until that date.
Joan Poutre made a motion to table application 06-097 by David Converse/David Humphrey until their meeting on November 21, 2006 at 7:30 here in the council room of the municipal building. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Chairman Charles Elliott read application 06-096 by Winston Bartley to build an 80 ft by 57 ft retail building with storage on the second floor and a 6 ft by 57 ft covered walkway in the front. This property is located at 218 East Main Street and is in commercial zone B zoning district. James and Winston Bartley Jr. were present to explain the request. The building will be smaller than the prior building that was destroyed by a fire. The front of the building will be moved back to allow for better access and parking. The building will utilize the existing foundation. Parking was reviewed. Mr. & Mrs. Guyette, who own the building behind this property were concerned with their 20 ft ROW across the Bartley property. The site plan showed that this ROW would not be obstructed. Lighting was discussed and it will be minimal, with lighting under the porch and probably in lighted sign on the gable end facing East Main Street. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
There is no change proposed to the existing parking, traffic access, or circulation for pedestrians and vehicles.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
There is no change to the existing landscaping or screening. Setbacks are an improvement from what was there.
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project does not affect the utilization of renewable energy resources.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
Exterior lighting is minimal.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
The proposed use (retail) is a permitted use in the Commercial B zoning district.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
There is not changed proposed to the existing drainage control.
Drainage control is approved as submitted.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Clark Curtis made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-096 by Winston Bartley with 2 conditions, 1) All debris from the building destroyed by fire must be removed prior to beginning construction and 2) the 20 ft ROW access the property in the rear must not be obstructed. Seconded by Joan Poutre. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
9:00 p.m.: Upon a motion by Clark Curtis, seconded by Joan Poutre, the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley and filed for the record on 10/19/06.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Charlie Elliott, Clark Curtis, Joan Poutre and Paul Chandler.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Alan Franklin.
OTHERS PRESENT: Paul Monette, Steve Blake, Bob Kelley.
7:45 p.m.: Chairman Charles Elliott called the meeting to order. Paul Chandler made a motion to approve the minutes to the last meeting (Sept 26) as written. Seconded by Joan Poutre. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Discussion on Personal Wireless Telecommunication Facilities began. Clark Curtis stated that he would not be participating as a commission member due to past allegations of influencing the regulations. Mr. Curtis left the table and sat in the chairs with the general public and participated as a member of the public. Charlie Elliott gave a brief overview of the draft he is proposing to simplify the regulations. Concerns of several sections of the draft were expressed and some changes were made. The commission will continue review of the revised draft at a later meeting after they have a chance to review the changes made tonight.
A new Municipal Education Grant Program was reviewed. Deadline for applying is May 12, 2007.
9:20 p.m.: Upon a motion by Joan Poutre, seconded by Paul Chandler, the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley and filed for the record on 10/10/06.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Charlie Elliott, Clark Curtis, Joan Poutre and Paul Chandler.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Alan Franklin.
OTHERS PRESENT: Joe Belisle, Louis Daigle, Liz Graves, Linda Gariepy, John Gariepy, Rhonda Bullis, Bob Kelley.
7:35 p.m.: Chairman Charles Elliott called the meeting to order. Joan Poutre made a motion to approve the minutes to the last meeting (Sept 5) as written. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Joan Poutre made a motion to skip to item #3 on the agenda. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Chairman Charles Elliott read application 06-086 by Louis Daigle to subdivide 2 existing lots into 5 lots. This property is located off Scottsdale Road and is in a general residential zoning district. Louis Daigle was present to explain the request. Except for Mr. Daigle no one else was present to participate or bring up any issues. Excavation work, water/sewer, and a letter from Public Works Director Tom Bernier were discussed. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
Access is via Scottsdale Road, parking is not applicable, and no sidewalks are proposed.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
This is for a subdivision only. Landscaping, screening and setbacks are not an issue.
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project does not affect the utilization of renewable energy resources.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
No exterior lighting is proposed.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
Future development of the proposed lots is anticipated to be single-family dwellings.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
Any project that disturbs more than 1 acre of land requires a permit from the State.
Drainage control is deferred to the State. If the State determines a storm water permit is not required, then the applicant must revise this permit and submit a detailed drainage control plan.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Joan Poutre made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-086 by Louis Daigle as submitted with the condition that the project comply with all conditions outlined in the letter from Public Works Director Tom Bernier dated 9/25/06. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Chairman Charles Elliott read application 06-084 by Wai Cha Wan to build a 30 ft by 70 ft office/retail building. This property is located at 540 East Main Street and is in Commercial Zone B zoning district. Clark Curtis stated he would not participate on this application because he had an indirect financial interest. Joe Belisle was present to represent the applicant and explain the request. Several neighbors were present and had concerns with drainage, tree removal, an existing retaining wall, and the use of the building. Drainage from the parking area will be directed toward East Main Street where there are existing storm drains and the roof will be directed over the bank and there are no plans for disturbing the bank or removing trees. Erosion control measures will be used to prevent any disturbed soil from washing away. The proposed use will be either offices or retail and it is hoped to rent it to one tenant, but the building will be designed so that it could be easily split into 2 units. There are no plans to have a restaurant at this location. The way the application was filled out Western Ave is considered to be the front yard and East Main St the left side yard. The application was amended to clarify this and Mr. Belisle initialed the change. A letter from Public Works Director Tom Bernier was discussed The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
Access is from East Main Street via 2 existing curb cuts, there is an existing sidewalk along East Main Street for pedestrians.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project does not affect the utilization of renewable energy resources.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
Exterior lighting is minimal.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
The proposed use (office/retail) is a permitted use in the Commercial B zoning district.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
There is not changed proposed to the existing drainage control.
Drainage control is approved as submitted.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Paul Chandler made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-084 by Wai Cha Wan as amended with the condition that the project comply with all conditions outlined in the letter from Public Works Director Tom Bernier dated 9/25/06. Seconded by Joan Poutre. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION with Clark Curtis abstaining.
Joan Poutre made a motion to table discussion on cell towers until their next meeting so that they can review the changes made by Charlie Elliott. Seconded by Paul Chandler. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
8:30 p.m.: Upon a motion by Joan Poutre, seconded by Clark Curtis, the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley and filed for the record on 10/4/06.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Charlie Elliott, Clark Curtis, Paul Chandler.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Alan Franklin, Joan Poutre.
OTHERS PRESENT: Bob Kelley.
7:35 p.m.: Chairman Charles Elliott called the meeting to order. Paul Chandler made a motion to approve the minutes to the last meeting (Aug 29) as written. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Discussion began on bylaw amendments and reports. Minor changes were made to the amendments and reports. Amendments pending a public hearing are:
· Add a footnote to rear yard minimums in the General Residential and Urban Residential zoning districts stating, “The rear yard minimum abutting a railroad track is 20 ft.”
· Change §509.03 to read, “All structures, except boathouses, docks, and uncovered porches, shall be at least seventy-five (75) feet from the shoreline…”
· Add “§345 Outdoor Waterstoves - All outdoor waterstoves (otherwise known as outdoor wood burning furnaces) are prohibited within all zoning districts in the City of Newport”
· Add the following definition to §702 “Outdoor Waterstove: Any furnace designed to burn wood and used for the purpose of heating water where the furnace is located outside the structure into which the hot water produced thereby is piped”
Reports for the above amendments were approved.
Cell towers were briefly discussed. Charlie Elliott has a rough draft for changes that will be cleaned up and discussed at a later meeting.
Their next meeting was discussed. A quorum will not be available for the meeting on the 3rd Tuesday and that meeting was canceled. Paul Chandler made a motion to schedule a meeting for the 4th Tuesday, September 26th. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
9:05 p.m.: Upon a motion by Clark Curtis, seconded by Paul Chandler, the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley and filed for the record on 9/7/06.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Charlie Elliott, Clark Curtis, Joan Poutre and Paul Chandler.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Alan Franklin.
OTHERS PRESENT: Marie Westlake, James Bartley, Bob Kelley.
7:30 p.m.: Vice-Chair Joan Poutre called the meeting to order. Paul Chandler made a motion to approve the minutes to the last meeting (Aug 1) as written. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Joan Poutre read application 06-070 by Winston & Barbara Bartley for a change of use permit to change the use of the first floor to retail. This property is located at 349 East Main Street and is in commercial zone B zoning district. James Bartley was present to explain the request. The site plan and application were amended to add a 5 ft wide walkway across the front of the building. Mr. Bartley initialed the changes. Mr. Bartley stated they have a line striping machine and plan on striping the parking spaces. He thought that if they were really creative they could fit 15 parking spaces. Clark Curtis noted that only 8 are required. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
There is no change proposed to the existing parking, traffic access, or circulation for pedestrians and vehicles.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
There is no change to the existing landscaping, screening, or setbacks.
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project does not affect the utilization of renewable energy resources.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
Exterior lighting is minimal.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
The proposed use (retail) is a permitted use in the Commercial B zoning district.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
There is not changed proposed to the existing drainage control.
Drainage control is approved as submitted.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Clark Curtis made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-070 by Winston & Barbara Bartley as amended to reflect the walkway. Seconded by Paul Chandler. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Chairman Charles Elliott read application 06-061 by KCI Holdings LLC for a change of use permit to change a portion of their building from office to retail. This property is located at 98 Western Ave and is in Commercial Zone B zoning district. This application was tabled from their August 1, 2006 meeting. Marie Westlake was present to explain the request. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
There is no change proposed to the existing parking, traffic access, or circulation for pedestrians and vehicles.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
There is no change to the existing landscaping, screening, or setbacks.
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project does not affect the utilization of renewable energy resources.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
Exterior lighting is minimal.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
The proposed use (retail) is a permitted use in the Commercial B zoning district.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
There is not changed proposed to the existing drainage control.
Drainage control is approved as submitted.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Joan Poutre made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-061 by KCI Holdings LLC as submitted. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The commission decided to meet next week for a planning session only to review pending amendments and write reports for those they wish to proceed with.
8:25 p.m.: Upon a motion by Joan Poutre, seconded by Clark Curtis, the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley and filed for the record on 9/1/06.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Charlie Elliott, Clark Curtis, Joan Poutre and Paul Chandler.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Alan Franklin.
OTHERS PRESENT: Fred Oeschger, Mark Stewart, Steve Lawson, Thomas Barry, Denise Bowen, Bernadette Beloin, Joan Green, Sheila Quinn, Bob Kelley.
7:35 p.m.: Vice chair Joan Poutre called the meeting to order. Clark Curtis made a motion to approve the minutes to the last meeting (Jul 11) as written. Seconded by Paul Chandler. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Vice chair Joan Poutre read application 06-061 by KCI Holdings LLC for a change of use permit to change a portion of their building from office to retail. This property is located at 98 Western Ave and is in Commercial Zone B zoning district. Clark Curtis made a motion to table this application until the end of the meeting because the applicant was not present to explain the request. Seconded by Paul Chandler. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Chairman Charles Elliott read application 06-063 by Newport City Motel Corp to add a 19 unit extended stay motel. This is a renewal of a permit that expired earlier this year. This property is located at 444 East Main Street and is in Commercial Zone B zoning district. Mark Stewart, the architect for the project, was present to explain the request. Parking was reviewed and it was determined that the conference room had a capacity of 60 people. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
There are 120 on and off street parking spaces proposed, access is from East Main Street, and there is a sidewalk on both sides of the street.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
The landscape plan shows plantings for various trees, shrubs, and flowers. Setbacks are typical for the area.
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project does not affect the utilization of renewable energy resources.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
Exterior lighting is minimal.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
This project is located on a main commercial corridor in the City and is an extension of the current use.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
The proposed drainage plan has been approve by the Director of Public Works.
Drainage control is approved as submitted.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Joan Poutre made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-063 by Newport City Motel Corp as submitted. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Chairman Charles Elliott read application 06-065 by Regis Beloin Trust for a change of use permit to change the first floor of their building from a neighborhood store to a soup kitchen/meals on wheels. This property is located at 498 Highland Ave and is in an urban residential zoning district. Mrs. Beloin and Mr. Lawson were present to explain the request. The soup kitchen/meals on wheels is currently located on Main Street. They operate 4 days a week from approx 8:00 to 12:30. They deliver meals to approx 40 households and typically serve 5 meals onsite. On holidays they may serve as many as 15 meals onsite and at other busy times they might serve 10 meals onsite. Their cliental is mostly elderly or mentally challenged. Three people from the neighborhood were present, Thomas Barry, Sheila Quinn, and Joan Green. Their concern was that the people that come for meals onsite might loiter around the neighborhood after having their meal. They felt that this could cause problems in the neighborhood. It was noted that there are no sidewalks in the neighborhood and it was questioned how the people eating meals onsite would get there and leave. Mr. Lawson stated that in the past RCT was willing to transport to a different site, but he has not discussed it with them recently. It was noted that RCT does go to the Bel-Aire Center that is just around the corner. Mr. Lawson does not believe that people will be hanging around after their meals. Currently they do have one lady that loves to talk and does linger after her meal. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
There is no significant change from the current parking, traffic access, and circulation.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
There is no change to landscaping or screening proposed. Setbacks are typical for the area.
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project does not affect the utilization of renewable energy resources.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
Exterior lighting is minimal.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
Traffic in and out of the site will be minimal.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
There is no change to drainage control.
Drainage control is approved as submitted.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Paul Chandler made a motion to enter into deliberative session on this application. Seconded by Joan Poutre. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Upon returning form deliberative session Paul Chandler made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-065 by Regis Beloin Trust with the condition that 2 signs be posted, one stating the hours and days they are open and one stating “No Loitering”. Seconded by Joan Poutre. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The commission recommended that Mr. Lawson work with RCT in setting up a schedule for dropping off and picking up clients. The commission also requested that if the neighbors observe any problems in the area that they notify the commission by either calling or writing the zoning administrator who will pass it along to them.
Joan Poutre made a motion to table application 06-061 by KCI Holdings LLC until their meeting on August 15, 2006 at 7:30 pm here in the council room of the municipal building because the applicant or his representative was not present to explain the request. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
In other business a few possible zoning violations were brought up; Passumpsic Savings Bank appears to be adding more fill than was permitted on their application; Curves has not put up all the required signs for traffic control; and there is a garage or shed being constructed on Trempe St without a permit.
9:10 p.m.: Upon a motion by Joan Poutre, seconded by Paul Chandler, the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley and filed for the record on 8/3/06.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Alan Franklin, Clark Curtis, Joan Poutre.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Charlie Elliott, Paul Chandler.
OTHERS PRESENT: Fran Risinger, Judy Ferrari, Joe Ferrari, John Monette, Paul Julien, Andy Larocque, Steven Elsbree, Doug Spates, Melanie Graham, Holliey White, Louise Reiff, Jacques Roberge, Bob Kelley.
7:40 p.m.: Joan Poutre called the meeting to order. Clark Curtis made a motion to approve the minutes to the last meeting (Jun 20) as written. Seconded by Alan Franklin. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Joan Poutre read application 06-051 by Nextel Partners/Newport Country Club to amend permit 04-070 to change the color of the communications pole from gray to green. This property is located at 590 Mount Vernon Street and is in general residential zoning district. Mr. Elsbree (NEXTEL) and Mr. Spates (Newport Country Club) were present to explain the request. The tower was repainted earlier this spring. There were problems with the upper portion of the tower that needed to be fixed and some of the original paint was peeling. Newport Country Club requested that the color be changed to green when it was repainted. NEXTEL will be contacting the State to see if an amendment to their Act 250 permit is needed. The Board felt that although the new color is more visible against the sky it is acceptable. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
There is no change from the current parking, traffic access, and circulation.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
The color of the pole is a type of screening. The new green color provides adequate screening. There is no change to the landscaping. Setbacks are typical for the area.
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project does not affect the utilization of renewable energy resources.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
Exterior lighting is minimal.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
No change in the relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
There is no change to drainage control.
Drainage control is approved as submitted.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Alan Franklin made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-051 by Nextel Partners/Newport Country Club as submitted. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Joan Poutre read application 06-053 by Fran Risinger to split off 0.06 acre to sell to an abutting property owner. This property is located at 353 Farrant Street and is in a general residential zoning district. Ms. Risinger was present to explain the request. The reason for this is to sell the small portion to Mr. Larocque to resolve a zoning issue. Ms. Risinger’s remaining lot will still conform to the bylaw. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
There is no change from the current parking, traffic access, and circulation.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
There is no change to the landscaping or screening. Setbacks are typical for the area.
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project does not affect the utilization of renewable energy resources.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
Exterior lighting is minimal.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
No change in the relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
There is no change to drainage control.
Drainage control is approved as submitted.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Alan Franklin made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-053 by Fran Risinger as submitted. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Joan Poutre read application 06-054 by Great Bay Hydro Corporation for a lot line adjustment to transfer 0.14 acres from one lot (Book 161, Page 184) to be combined with another lot (Book 161, Page 202). This property is located off Clyde Street and is in the conservation and general residential zoning districts. Mr. Monette was present to explain the request. The location of the parcel was discussed. There will be no new lot created, the 0.14 acre will be combined by deed adding it to the adjacent lot. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
There is no change from the current parking, traffic access, and circulation.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
There is no change to the landscaping or screening. Setbacks are typical for the area.
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project does not affect the utilization of renewable energy resources.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
Exterior lighting is minimal.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
No change in the relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
There is no change to drainage control.
Drainage control is approved as submitted.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Clark Curtis made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-054 by Great Bay Hydro Corporation as submitted. Seconded by Alan Franklin. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Joan Poutre read application 06-007 by Jerry Abbott to cut into his back bank and control the drainage for an addition to his existing building. This property is located at 28 Cottage Street and is in an urban residential zoning district. This application was tabled from their June 20, 2006 meeting. The applicant, once again, was not present to explain the request. Ms. White expressed concerns with the drainage into the street and with erosion of the bank on her property that this project might cause. The information the Commission requested of the applicant was not submitted. Zoning Administrator Bob Kelley stated that he personally delivered the minutes of the last meeting and a letter outlining the information that the Commission had requested of the applicant. This was the 5th meeting the Planning Commission has had on this application and the applicant or his representative has only showed up at one of the meetings and has made no response to the Commission’s request for additional information. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
N/A.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
Failure to address neighbors concerns re: bank stability, after repeated request by this board.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
N/A.
4.) Exterior lighting;
N/A.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
Failure to address neighbors concerns and several requests from the Planning Commission.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
Failure to submit final contours, did not submit a plan to stabilize bank, failure to address runoff concerns onto street, retaining wall details not submitted as per request.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
Failure to submit requested materials
Alan Franklin made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-007 by Jerry Abbott as submitted. Seconded by Clark Curtis. Ayes – none. Nays - Alan Franklin, Clark Curtis, Joan Poutre. THE APPLICATION WAS DENIED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION OF THE MEMBERS PRESENT.
Other Business: Bob Kelley requested clarification of a couple sections of the bylaw. The VT Municipal Planning Grant Program was discussed and the commission will discuss possible projects that might qualify at their next meeting. The commission decided that their next meeting would be the first Tuesday in August as there are no applications pending for next week.
9:00 p.m.: Upon a motion by Alan Franklin, seconded by Clark Curtis, the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley and filed for the record on 7/13/06.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Charlie Elliott, Clark Curtis, Paul Chandler.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Alan Franklin, Joan Poutre.
OTHERS PRESENT: Ken McAllister, Jacques Roberge, Melanie Graham, Bob Kelley.
7:35 p.m.: Chairman Charles Elliott called the meeting to order. Paul Chandler made a motion to approve the minutes to the last meeting (Jun 6) as written. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Chairman Charles Elliott read application 06-047 by Ken & Karen McAllister to build a 12 ft by 30 ft sunroom onto the side of their house. This property is located at 1197 East Main Street and is in commercial zone B zoning district. Mr. McAllister was present to explain the request. The addition does not affect parking or circulation. The Commission reviewed the site plan in accordance with Section 507.
1.) The adequacy of parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles with particular attention to safety;
There is no change from the current parking, traffic access, and circulation.
Parking, traffic access, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is approved as submitted.
2.) The adequacy of landscaping, screening, and setbacks with regard to achieving maximum compatibility and protection to adjacent properties;
There is no significant landscaping or screening proposed. Setbacks are typical for the area.
Landscaping, screening, and setbacks are approved as submitted.
3.) The protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources;
This project will utilize a renewable energy resource. The sunroom will add passive solar heat.
Protection of the utilization of renewable energy resources is approved as submitted.
4.) Exterior lighting;
Exterior lighting is minimal.
Exterior lighting is approved as submitted.
5.) Harmonious relationship between proposed uses and existing adjacent uses;
Traffic in and out of the site no change.
The relationship between the proposed and existing adjacent uses is approved as submitted.
6.) The adequacy of drainage control;
There is no significant change to drainage control.
Drainage control is approved as submitted.
7.) Compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw;
This project is in compliance with all pertinent parts of the Newport City bylaw as submitted.
Clark Curtis made a motion to grant site plan approval to application 06-047 by Ken & Karen McAllister as submitted. Seconded by Paul Chandler. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Chairman Charles Elliott read application 06-007 by Jerry Abbott to cut into his back bank and control the drainage for an addition to his existing building. This property is located at 28 Cottage Street and is in an urban residential zoning district. This application was tabled from their June 6, 2006 meeting. The applicant was not present to explain the request. There was discussion on how long they should and could continue to table applications. Bob Kelley will contact NVDA for their opinion on how long they can table an application. Mr. Roberge thought the Commission was being very lenient with the applicant. The Commission felt that they would end testimony on this application at their next meeting whether the applicant was present or not and would make their decision on testimony received.
Paul Chandler made a motion to table application 06-007 by Jerry Abbott until 7:30 pm, Tuesday, July 11, 2006 here in the Council Room of the Municipal Building for any new evidence to be submitted for action on this application. Seconded by Clark Curtis. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
§502.04 was discussed and it was determined that an administrative renewal of a permit must be applied for prior to the permit expiring 2 years from the date of issuance.
Telecommunication Facilities were discussed. A markup of the regulations made by Charlie Elliott will be cleaned up and reviewed at a later date. It was noted that there were a couple of possible zoning violations involving telecommunication towers, there is a tower at the building leased by the hospital on Crawford Farm Rd, and the Nextel tower at the golf course was painted a different color
Outdoor wood boilers were discussed and the Commission decided that they should be banned from all properties in the City of Newport. This will be added to the list of amendments awaiting a hearing.
9:50 p.m.: Upon a motion by Paul Chandler, seconded by Clark Curtis, the meeting was adjourned. APPROVED BY A UNANIMOUS DECISION.
The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley and filed for the record on 6/26/06.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Charlie Elliott, Clark Curtis, Joan Poutre and Paul Chandler.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Alan Franklin.
OTHERS PRESENT: John Campbell, Pat Bryan, John Groff, Brad Maxwell, Scott Graham, Melanie Graham, Real Desrochers, Gene Besaw, Bill Hogan, Jacques Roberge, JD Abbott, Bob Kelley.
7:40 p.m.: Chairman Charles Elliott called the meeting to order. Clark Curtis made a motion to approve the minutes to the last meeting (May 16) as written. Seconded by Joan Poutre. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Joan Poutre made a motion to forward the 2 bylaw amendments just discussed at the public hearing to the City Council for their approval. Seconded by Paul Chandler. APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION.
Chairman Charles Elliott opened the meeting for discussion on application 06-007 by Jerry Abbott to cut into his back bank and control the drainage for an addition to his existing building. This property is located at 28 Cottage Street and is in an urban residential zoning district. This application was tabled from a prior meeting on May 16, 2006. JD Abbott was present to explain the request.
It should be noted that the Commission meet at the Abbott property earlier this evening (7:00) for a site inspection. The following were present at the site visit: Clark Curtis, Joan Poutre, Paul Chandler, Scott Graham, Melanie Graham, Jacques Roberge, Bob Kelley. The building location and lay of the land were viewed. Mr. Roberge and Mr. & Mrs. Graham discussed concerns with the project at the site visit that were reiterated during discussion at the regular meeting listed below.